It would appear that the proverbial elephant — or perhaps in this case, the bear — in the living room has finally been revealed.
The Kremlin may still
deny it, but the evidence of a Russian invasion, or at least an
incursion, into Ukraine is compelling: NATO spy photos,
eye-witness accounts from fleeing Ukrainian soldiers, and even a
ranking member of Vladimir Putin’s own human-rights council, all seem to
point toward the presence of Russian soldiers — several battalions’
worth and with sophisticated weapons — fighting with the rebels and
slowing, if not reversing, the recent Ukrainian military’s momentum on
the battlefield.
Even Alexander
Zakharchenko, the separatist leader of Donetsk, the regional capital,
proudly told viewers of Russian state television Thursday that 3,000 to
4,000 Russian soldiers had come to fight in eastern Ukraine, many during their own furloughs.
But if the once
unthinkable is fact, then what is the Russian president really up to
now? Opening up a new front in the war, the rebels say they are pushing —
with Moscow’s help — to the Sea of Azov, in Ukraine’s southeast, to
give any future breakaway entity there access to a warm-water port.
Some Ukrainians fear
that Putin’s real goal is a land corridor linking Russia and Crimea, the
strategic Ukrainian peninsula Putin annexed in March after the
Moscow-friendly government in Kiev fell.
A number of NATO
officials have spoken of Putin’s "grand plan": nothing less than
resurrecting the Soviet Union, an ambition that — in Putin’s mind —
would make a pro-Europe, pro-NATO Ukraine, looming on his very doorstep,
a threat that must be removed or at least seriously weakened.
But other voices are not
as shrill. Fyodor Lukyanov, the Editor of "Russia in Global Affairs" and
the Chairman of Russia’s Council on Foreign and Defense Policy,
believes that Putin actually lacks a big strategy, but excels at quick,
reactive tactics. He told NBC News that the Russian incursion into
Ukraine is all about pressuring Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko to
reach an agreement. "To let him know that the war is unwinnable,"
Lukyanov said, "and to accept direct talks with the separatists."
"That simply will never
happen," insisted Ukrainian analyst Sergei Strokan, who works for the
Russian radio station “Voice of Russia.” He said the likelihood of
Poroshenko sitting down and negotiating with the rebels — the Ukrainians
call them "terrorists" — would be like former President George W. Bush
bargaining face-to-face with Osama bin Laden. "Never. It would be
political suicide," said Strokan. "To recognize the rebels you would
have to wipe today’s Ukraine off the map and replace it with some new,
non-existent Ukraine."
Putin, ever the shadowy
former KGB officer, rarely speaks or writes about his end-game in
Ukraine, besides some platitudes about protecting the Russian minority
there and wanting a prosperous and unified neighbor. Which makes all the
speculation about Putin’s true intentions all the more intriguing … and
probably wrong.
But Ukrainian
government officials like Andrei Kuzmenko, acting ambassador to the
United Kingdom, have no doubt about what drives Vladimir Putin in
Ukraine. "He can’t bear to see, and will do everything to prevent, a
thriving, free, democratic country like Ukraine on his border," Kuzmenko
told NBC News. "For the simple reason that, if we Ukrainians can do it,
so could the Russians … at his own peril."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in comments are those of the comment writers alone and does not reflect or represent the views of Skazyupdate